Cheap Oakleys LATCH belongs to the optical glasses that are worn daily, in fact, the sports properties are not strong. But speaking of the previous CROSSLINK, even if the silicone can replace the nose pads + the silicone temples (sleeves), it will still feel slippery after wearing it for a long time. However, CROSSLINK can tighten the “hoops” of the temples by itself.
This is the Chamfer I’m wearing now, and the temples are also covered with a silicone sleeve. The so-called sports wear is suitable, provided that the amount of sweat and oil is not so large.
The previous CROSSLINK has only been worn for more than half a year, and the silicone sleeves of the temples have already cracked. Fortunately, a pair was included with the purchase. Chamfer’s silicone cover seems to be more durable. It has been used for almost two years. Except for a little looseness, there are no major problems.
In terms of weight, LATCH S is slightly heavier than CROSSLINK, and Chamfer is the lightest. I have bought MARSHAL MNP before, but it felt too heavy and I returned it.
For other uses, there is nothing to say about LATCH S, just a pair of daily glasses. I took it out of the box and sent it directly to the place where the glasses were fitted. And I haven’t had the opportunity to wear it for running. Would prefer Chamfer, the lightest.
The three silicone nose pads are still useful, and they are much more comfortable than the metal ones. It is recommended that if the skin is oily, the nose pads should be replaced every six months to one year.
Fake Oakley’s strongest products should still be the more professional sports snow goggles and sunglasses series, and the more sporty CROSSLINK and the like, after personal use, I feel that it is indeed lighter, and it is also very suitable for sports. However, if you are doing a slightly strenuous/risky exercise, it is best to use it with a spectacle cord.
Thinking about my CROSSLINK that fell at the bottom of Qiandao Lake, it should have been in service to this day.
And the daily sheet optical mirror, similar to this LATCH S, I only see the discount + the style is not bad when I buy it. All kinds of rhetoric are just gimmicks). In terms of workmanship, it is still possible that imitations are better than real ones. It seems that many eyewear brands have such an embarrassing problem.